Whisper Loads

 

Making Ultra Light Loads

 

By: John Goins/akabeage

 

 

For whatever use you intend them, these are interesting loads and useful for a variety of purposes.  It’s an old concept and has been around for years and various authors have published much on it over the years. When I started digging, I discovered many threads in the old Shooters Talk archives on the subject, Paco Kelly on Sixgunner.Com has written much about these loads and searching back through the works of the old masters like Mattern, Narramore, Mathews, and Sharpe bring to light much more information on this type load.

 

Whatever name you apply to them; pest loads, whisper loads, quiet loads, gallery loads or sub-sonic loads, they all follow the same characteristics.  Low velocity compared to other loads and we usually expect this to be sub-sonic. The use of a soft lead cast projectile, either plain base or gas check, or a cast round ball.  The load will be quiet, usually possessing the noise level of a .22 short or thereabouts. They tend to be quite accurate and are designed for ranges up to about 50 yards. The loads are easy to assemble and in fact some use jacketed bullet although us bullet casters would never stoop to such a low class act.

 

Much ado was made of the famed .300 Whisper about 10 years ago as being designed to be fired from a suppressed weapon using a 190 grain Sierra Match King at sub-sonic velocities and used as a short range assassination round by paramilitary forces. This round achieved much notoriety as many shooters took it to their bosom as a “magic” round with all kind of capabilities. This cartridge, along with the 9mm sub-sonic rounds used by the SEALs in their suppressed modified MP-5 sub machine guns aroused high interest in subsonic loads.

 

Much discussion has been on the various talk sites about the accuracy advantages of sub sonic bullets.

 

But, the concept of low velocity and subsequently, low noise loads is not new.  The Army had the old gallery loads and even though not sub-sonic in many cases, they were used to the extent that many old time Army, Marine Corps, and National guard units had government issued loading tools and moulds for making this type load.

 

I’d read about these loads over the years but had kind of tucked it back into the recess of my mind as something to try sometime until last week when a friend in Vermont asked about a quiet loads for his 7.62 X 39 mm Ruger.

 

I dug around in my stuff and came up with several of Paco Kelly’s articles and sent those up to him.  In several days, I received a reply and he’d settled on a 314299 bullet sized to .310” over 2.0 grains of Bullseye.  No chronograph figures but he did state that they went into the same hole at 25 yards.  More data will be forthcoming from tests at 50 yards but I expect accuracy to be at least “minute of blackbird” at 50 yards.

 

 

 These tests got me to thinking that there might be interest in a load of this type so I checked the Shooters archives and there has been great interest in the past so I’ll attempt to play with these loads a bit and see what I can come up with.

 

I won’t address the gallery load, as normally, the velocity is a bit higher on these.  Small game loads fall within almost the same velocity range as do the gallery loads and that’s another subject. Instead, I’ll try and look at the true “whisper” loads (sub sonic) and see how silent and accurate they really are.

 

Parameters of the Test

 

For these tests, I have selected four calibers as I have rifles in all of these calibers and I believe they are pretty much a cross section of the various case capacities you’ll try these loads in.

 

.223 Remington

.30/30 Winchester

.30/06 Springfield

.45/70 Government

 

The bullets will all be plain based as I feel there is no need for the gas checks at these velocities even though accuracy might be enhanced.

 

I’ll use the following bullets

225353 Lyman

30-150-FN-CM RCBS

457122 HP Lyman – Now, the hollow point is superfluous to these tests as it doesn’t stand a chance of expanding.  I felt that more folks would have this mould if they have a .45/70 and if they don’t, they need one.

 

Powders will be of the fast burning variety.  Many more are suitable but these are the ones that I happened to have on hand.

 

Clays

700-X

Bullseye

Red Dot

Tite Group

WW 231

 

I’ll use a tuft of Dacron on top of the powder change to hold the powder back against the primer for more reliable ignition.  Now, due to the controversy over fillers and chamber ringing , follow this practice at your own risk.

 

I chose to test specific weights of powder in each cartridge.  No attempt was made to “tweak” specific loads for optimum performance.

 

In working with this type load, be damned sure that after each shot, you either get a chronograph reading or insure that a hole appeared in your target.  Normally, through a scope, you can see these bullets in the air, especially if the light is good.  There is always the danger of  a bullet sticking in the barrel so insure that you check the barrel each time you fire to be sure the bullet exited.

 

L-R: 225352 Ideal, 30-150-CM RCBS, 457122 Lyman

 

.223 Remington

 

For the .223 Remington, I chose an old Ideal bullet that has long fallen out of use.  It’s a #225353.  It’s a plain base design weighing 44.5 grains ready to load. I’ve never gotten this bullet to shoot very well at conventional velocities so I thought I’d give it a try with light loads due to the plain base. From my testing, it appears that almost any .22 bullet, either plain base or gas check will work at these velocities

 

Tests with the Ideal #225353 in the .223

Bullet

Weight

Powder

Weight

Average

Velocity

Standard

Deviation

Primer

Sized

Overall Length

Comments

Ideal 225353

44.5

Bullseye

/dacron ¼” square

2.0

1045

15.9

WSR

.2255

2.015

1.5” @ 50 yards

 

Ideal 225353

44.5

Red Dot

/dacron

¼” square

2.0

1026

20.2

WSR

.2255

2.015

1.1” @ 50 yards

 

Ideal 225353

44.5

Bullseye

/dacron ¼” square

1.5

855

33.5

WSR

.2255

2.025

1.5” @ 50 yards

 

Ideal 225353

44.5

Red Dot

/dacron  ¼” square

 

1.5

859

27.3

WSR

.2255

2.025

2” @ 50 yards

vertical stringing

Ideal 225353

44.5

Clays

/dacron ¼” square

1.5

754

20.0

WSR

.2255

2.025

1.5” @ 50 yards

Ideal 225353

44.5

700-X

/dacron  ¼” square

1.5

857

10.2

WSR

.2255

2.025

1” @ 50 yards

Ideal 225353

44.5

WW 231

/dacron  ¼” square

1.5

699

18.8

WSR

.2255

2.025

2” @ 50 yards

Ideal 225353

44.5

Titegroup

/dacron ¼” square

1.5

761

21.6

WSR

.2255

2.015

1.25” @ 50

Yds

22-55-SP RCBS

57.4

700-X

/dacron ¼” square

1.5

763

13.9

WSR

.2255

No GC

2.019

1.5” @ 50

Yds

22-55-SP RCBS

57.4

Red Dot

/dacron ¼” square

1.5

737

17.6

WSR

.2255

No GC

2.019

1.5” @ 50

Yds

 

Test rifle was a Number 1-V Ruger with a 6-24X scope mounted. The 22-55-SP RCBS bullet tests were fired using sized bullets without gas checks.

 

Penetration tests were performed on 2” X 6” pine lumber with the .223.  Penetration was complete at 50 yards and should be adequate for use on small pests.

 

.30/30 Winchester

 

For these tests, I chose the 30-150-CM RCBS plain base cowboy bullet as it was the only PB .30 I had in a configuration over 100 grains.

 

Tests with the 30-150-CM RCBS bullet in the .30/30

Bullet

Weight

Powder

Weight

Average

Velocity

Standard

Deviation

Primer

Sized

Overall Length

Comments

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Bullseye/

Dacron 3/8” square

2.0

611

15.5

F210

.311

2.470

2.5” @ 50 Yds

 

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Red Dot/Dacron 3/8” square

2.0

579

14.5

F210

.311

2.470

1.5” @ 50

Yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

WW231/

Dacron 3/8” square

2.0

548

6.4

F210

.310

2.470

2” @ 50

Yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

700-X/

Dacron 3/8”

square

2.0

614

6.7

F210

.310

2.470

1.5” @ 50 Yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Clays

/Dacron 3/8” square

2.0

561

12.1

F210

.310

2.470

2” @ 50

Yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Titegroup

/Dacron 3/8” square

2.0

602

6.8

F210

.310

2.470

2” @ 50

Yds

 

Test rifle was a Model 94 Winchester Legacy with a 2-10X Weaver.

 

.30/06 Springfield

 

Tests with the 30-150-CM RCBS bullet in the .30/06

Bullet

Weight

Powder

Weight

Average

Velocity

Standard

Deviation

Primer

Sized

Overall Length

Comments

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Bullseye

/Dacron ½” square

2.5

616

9.7

HLP

.310

2.933

1.5” @

50 yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

700-X

/Dacron

½”

square

2.5

612

10.2

HLP

.310

2.933

1.5” @

50 yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Red Dot

/Dacron

½” square

2.5

583

6.3

HLP

.310

2.933

1” @

50 yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

WW 231

/Dacron

½”

square

2.5

560

11.5

HLP

.310

2.933

1” @

50 yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Clays

/Dacron ½”

square

2.5

556

16.4

HLP

.310

2.933

1” @ 50 yds

30-150-CM

RCBS

150.7

Titegroup

/Dacron ½” square

2.5

585

23.8

HLP

..310

2.933

1.5” @ 50 Yds

311291

Lyman

184.8

WW 231

/Dacron ½” square

2.5

470

6.6

HLP

.310

No GC

2.985

1” @ 50 Yds

311291

Lyman

184.8

Bullseye

/Dacron ½’ square

2.5

538

8.6

HLP

.310

No GC

2.985

1” @ 50 Yds

 

HLP = Herters Large Pistol

Test rifle was a Ruger Number 1-B with a 4-16X Weaver scope. The 311291 bullets were fired using sized/lubed bullets without gas checks.

 

.45/70 Government

Bullet

Weight

Powder

Weight

Average

Velocity

Standard

Deviation

Primer

Sized

Overall Length

Comments

457122 HP

338.0

Bullseye

1” square dacron

4.0

613

1.5

F210

.459

2.500

2”@ 50 yards

vertical stringing

457122 HP

338.0

Red Dot

1” square dacron

4.0

579

13.8

F210

.459

2.500

One hole at 50 yards

457122 HP

338.0

700-X

1” square

dacron

4.0

572

10.6

F210

.459

2.500

1.5” @ 50

Yds

457122 HP

338.0

WW 231

1”

square

dacron

4.0

468

21.3

F210

.459

2.500

4” @ 50 Yds

457122 HP

338.0

Clays

1” square

dacron

4.0

524

10.4

F210

.459

2.500

1 hole @ 50 Yds

457122 HP

338.0

Titegroup

1”

square

dacron

4.0

574

14.1

F210

.459

2.500

2” @ 50 Yds

 

Test rifle is a Marlin M1895 with Ballard rifling.  A Weaver 2-10X scope was used for all tests.

 

 

 

457122 HP “whisper” bullet recovered at 100 yards.

Took a few dings but is mainly intact.

 

Lessons Learned

 

In testing these cartridges, the .30/06 probably emerged as the best whisper cartridge candidate.  It was the most silent considering case capacity.

 

The worst candidate, and this was hard for me to believe, was the old reliable .30/30.  It was also the loudest.

 

The .223 works very well and so does the .45/70 at sub sonic velocities.

 

None of these loads is exactly silent but the noise level is low enough that they can be shot without muffs and recoil is negligible.

 

Power is adequate for 50 yard plinking and for small pests at that range.

 

In the .30s, it looks like the heavier the bullet, the more accurate it is and also the quieter it is. I don’t think this would apply to the .45/70 as I feel that the 338 grain bullet is about optimum, for this purpose, in a .45 caliber cartridge.

 

There are vast differences between the point of impact between regular loads and whisper loads so the old theory of carrying a couple of light rounds while big game hunting  for bagging small game is not a practical practice.  Impact points ranged from 4-12” below normal point of impact and normally, slightly to the right.

 

Conclusion

 

Whisper loads are fun alternative loads with cast bullets.  It requires readjusting the sights to regulate impact.  They’re very easy to load and ideal for teaching younger shooters to handle big bore rifles without the associated noise and recoil while still retaining the accuracy required.

 

One of the drawbacks to these loads is the potential for ricochets.  Since the bullet is moving at slow speeds, they tend to bounce off backstops instead of digging in, fragmenting, or deforming.  Insure that you have a safe backstop when using them.  Even though the speed is slow, the kinetic energy still makes them as dangerous as a normal rifle round.

 

The loads I loaded are not silent.  The noise level is seriously degraded to the point where they may be used in locations that normal loads would cause unwanted attention.

 

If you feel the need for some of these loads, give them a try.  As I stated, I made no attempts to develop the ultimate load for each rifle.  This will have to be done with your rifle and your bullets.

 

I feel that I have given you enough starting loads in cartridges of varying case capacity and pointed out the pitfalls to keep you out of trouble in getting started.

 

Now, if you want to “whisper”, the rest is up to you.

 

 

Back to the Casting Fellows Homepage